Historical Travels:
The question that the Christians can not answer is: who has learned and taught Paul the origins of Christianity;
They recognize that Christ was not required !! And do not learn on his hands! And not even at the hands of his students, except that it is mentioned that he accompanied Barnabas, and this companionship argument on them; because they recognize that Barnabas disagreed with him, and his successor in the wake of that difference. It is our contention that this difference is due to Paul's misdeeds and his deviant views which explicitly violated the religion of Christ. This is evidenced by Paul's own references to some of that controversy in his letter to the Galatians; Barnabas was accused of insulting and liking the people of circumcision who obeyed the law of Moses in his call to work in the law, and not to eat him or to hold him to the pagans (2/11-14). In the Acts of the Apostles (15/39): (And a great dispute occurred between them until the difference of one another; and Barnabas and Moses went and went to Cyprus, but Paul chose Sila and went) Oh.
This is also the case with Peter or Sakhr, who is one of the closest disciples and the most prominent among them in Christ. In his letter to the people of Galatians (2/11-14), Paul himself mentions in his letter to the people of Galatians that Peter was brought to Antioch, and that he was to be baptized, Paul encountered him there and was angry at him and his opposite in this matter, which is the obligation of the law of Moses, because Peter did not eat the Christians who are out of idolatry because they are not committed to circumcision and the law. He said that he had lived with him fifteen days before in Jerusalem. He said, "I saw no other of the apostles except Jacob, brother of the Lord." (1/19)
It was not his meeting with the disciples of Christ; only a limited encounter with controversy and confrontation in the most serious matters of religion.
The scholar of the biography of this man, to admire who qualifies him and enables him to manifest the violation of Peter, which is the claim of the Christians closest people to Christ in the most serious issues of religion !! And what qualifies him to face him in this; and anger is not his power and power that stems from being a citizen of Romania nationals of the ruling state. (9/2), in which he also mentioned (9/27) that he tried to join the disciples (and that they were all afraid of him, they were not sure that he was a pupil).
It is also known that Paul was the one who converted the Christian religion, from a message of the Jews, to a universal message addressed to the pagans and others, as is evident in his letters; and facilitated by them to diminish the commitment to the laws and even abolish them and make them curse ... Christian advocates.
He thus violated a clear violation of what is attributed to Christ in their gospels from the commandments addressed to his Twelve Apostles (the Apostles)
As it is said in the Gospel of Matthew (10 / 1-9) and it has been said: "Do not walk to the pagans, nor enter a city for the Samaritans, but go to the lost sheep of the Israelites.
After all this, I am not exaggerating if I say that Paul was one of the most famous preachers in the world and one of the first preachers in the history of Christianity [((postponed: a group of Islamic sects deviant from the way of the Sunnis and the community, has appeared delay in the history of Islam is The separation of works and their postponement of the name of faith and its definition in the end of the first century AH, and began as an adverse reaction to the Kharijis who disbelieve Muslims in Kabir, and ended the delay in our time with his family to reduce the importance of work and even reckless or canceled it corner of the faith, prompting people to underestimate the rites Islam and its laws; And you will see that Paul has preceded it; how not and his ancestors are those who said (the fire will not touch us for only a few days) and they made the biggest shirk which is worshiping the calf as expiation Without the unbelieving disbelief in the fire !!]); and it was one of the largest shovels that corrupted this religion, as you see in almost all of his letters focuses on the underestimation of the work of the law of Moses, which is the law of Jesus peace be upon them; To exempt the Christians from the owners of idolatrous assets and even not to need it at all, as permitted to eat what was sacrificed On idols, and sells wine, as examples of this will come when speaking on his letters.
Because he believes that "those who advocate the work of the provisions of the Shariah have all been punished."
He says: "Christ saved us from the curse of the law, as it became a curse for us. It is written in the book," Cursed be He who hanged on his tree "
Faith in Christ is enough! (And the Shariah does not justify anyone with God because the righteous by faith lives) See his letter to the Galatians (2/16-17) and (3/10-13).
If it is mentioned that the act of sharia is mentioned in the same way: "Christ has freed us to be free; so be steadfast and do not return to the yoke of bondage." "The Christian can not reconcile the adherence to the law of Moses and the belief that salvation comes from Christ. He must choose one of the two things," the two parents commented here in the margin of the Catholic edition of the New Testament.
I said: Of course this is necessary for the impossibility of meeting the two extremes, either work and faith, or salvation and redemption by faith in Christ alone ... and then, O slave of the cross ...! Again, to all those who are circumcised, that you have to do all the law, you have been cut off from Christ, you who seek the righteousness of the law, and have fallen from grace. Meditation !!
It is not surprising that postponement is a Jewish heresy that Allaah has told us about in his book, where he said: "They said,
The question that the Christians can not answer is: who has learned and taught Paul the origins of Christianity;
They recognize that Christ was not required !! And do not learn on his hands! And not even at the hands of his students, except that it is mentioned that he accompanied Barnabas, and this companionship argument on them; because they recognize that Barnabas disagreed with him, and his successor in the wake of that difference. It is our contention that this difference is due to Paul's misdeeds and his deviant views which explicitly violated the religion of Christ. This is evidenced by Paul's own references to some of that controversy in his letter to the Galatians; Barnabas was accused of insulting and liking the people of circumcision who obeyed the law of Moses in his call to work in the law, and not to eat him or to hold him to the pagans (2/11-14). In the Acts of the Apostles (15/39): (And a great dispute occurred between them until the difference of one another; and Barnabas and Moses went and went to Cyprus, but Paul chose Sila and went) Oh.
This is also the case with Peter or Sakhr, who is one of the closest disciples and the most prominent among them in Christ. In his letter to the people of Galatians (2/11-14), Paul himself mentions in his letter to the people of Galatians that Peter was brought to Antioch, and that he was to be baptized, Paul encountered him there and was angry at him and his opposite in this matter, which is the obligation of the law of Moses, because Peter did not eat the Christians who are out of idolatry because they are not committed to circumcision and the law. He said that he had lived with him fifteen days before in Jerusalem. He said, "I saw no other of the apostles except Jacob, brother of the Lord." (1/19)
It was not his meeting with the disciples of Christ; only a limited encounter with controversy and confrontation in the most serious matters of religion.
The scholar of the biography of this man, to admire who qualifies him and enables him to manifest the violation of Peter, which is the claim of the Christians closest people to Christ in the most serious issues of religion !! And what qualifies him to face him in this; and anger is not his power and power that stems from being a citizen of Romania nationals of the ruling state. (9/2), in which he also mentioned (9/27) that he tried to join the disciples (and that they were all afraid of him, they were not sure that he was a pupil).
It is also known that Paul was the one who converted the Christian religion, from a message of the Jews, to a universal message addressed to the pagans and others, as is evident in his letters; and facilitated by them to diminish the commitment to the laws and even abolish them and make them curse ... Christian advocates.
He thus violated a clear violation of what is attributed to Christ in their gospels from the commandments addressed to his Twelve Apostles (the Apostles)
As it is said in the Gospel of Matthew (10 / 1-9) and it has been said: "Do not walk to the pagans, nor enter a city for the Samaritans, but go to the lost sheep of the Israelites.
After all this, I am not exaggerating if I say that Paul was one of the most famous preachers in the world and one of the first preachers in the history of Christianity [((postponed: a group of Islamic sects deviant from the way of the Sunnis and the community, has appeared delay in the history of Islam is The separation of works and their postponement of the name of faith and its definition in the end of the first century AH, and began as an adverse reaction to the Kharijis who disbelieve Muslims in Kabir, and ended the delay in our time with his family to reduce the importance of work and even reckless or canceled it corner of the faith, prompting people to underestimate the rites Islam and its laws; And you will see that Paul has preceded it; how not and his ancestors are those who said (the fire will not touch us for only a few days) and they made the biggest shirk which is worshiping the calf as expiation Without the unbelieving disbelief in the fire !!]); and it was one of the largest shovels that corrupted this religion, as you see in almost all of his letters focuses on the underestimation of the work of the law of Moses, which is the law of Jesus peace be upon them; To exempt the Christians from the owners of idolatrous assets and even not to need it at all, as permitted to eat what was sacrificed On idols, and sells wine, as examples of this will come when speaking on his letters.
Because he believes that "those who advocate the work of the provisions of the Shariah have all been punished."
He says: "Christ saved us from the curse of the law, as it became a curse for us. It is written in the book," Cursed be He who hanged on his tree "
Faith in Christ is enough! (And the Shariah does not justify anyone with God because the righteous by faith lives) See his letter to the Galatians (2/16-17) and (3/10-13).
If it is mentioned that the act of sharia is mentioned in the same way: "Christ has freed us to be free; so be steadfast and do not return to the yoke of bondage." "The Christian can not reconcile the adherence to the law of Moses and the belief that salvation comes from Christ. He must choose one of the two things," the two parents commented here in the margin of the Catholic edition of the New Testament.
I said: Of course this is necessary for the impossibility of meeting the two extremes, either work and faith, or salvation and redemption by faith in Christ alone ... and then, O slave of the cross ...! Again, to all those who are circumcised, that you have to do all the law, you have been cut off from Christ, you who seek the righteousness of the law, and have fallen from grace. Meditation !!
It is not surprising that postponement is a Jewish heresy that Allaah has told us about in his book, where he said: "They said,
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق