انا المصرى

الأربعاء، 12 يناير 2011

لا ثم لاتكون مصدر متاعب للاخرين

عفوا... لا ترقص على جروح الآخرين

يا من أنعم الله عليه بنعمة الوظيفة...

لا تجلس في مجلس به عاطل عن العمل أو موظف براتب منخفض

ولاتتحدث عن مشاريعك الاستثمارية والعقارية ورحلاتك الصيفية

ولكن إذا كان ولابد فقل ( ولست كاذباً في ذلك ) :

الأرزاق بيد الله وبركة المال في الكيف لا في الكم

وكم من صاحب أموال لا يجد السعادة ولا يذوق طعمها

فالجرح يزيد.. ولا يحتمل المزيد

يا من انعم الله عليها بنعمة الامومه...

في مجلس به امرأة حرمها الله نعمة الحمل والإنجاب

لاتتحدثي عن أطفالك وجمالهم وبراءتهم وسعادتك بتربيتهم

ولكن إذا كان ولابد فقولي ( ولستِ كاذبة في ذلك ) :

الأطــفــال والأبناء مـسـؤولــيــة كــبــيـرة وخـطـيـرة

وبقدومهم قد تـقـل الرومانسية والخصوصية بين الزوجين

فالجرح يزيد.. ولا يحتمل المزيد

يا من أنعم الله عليه بنعمة الشهادات العلمية...

في مجلس به شخص لم تسعفه الظروف لمواصلة تعليمه

لاتتحدث عن مؤهلاتك العلمية وثقافتك الواسعة ودرجاتك العلمية

ولكن إذا كان ولابد فقل ( ولست كاذباً في ذلك ) :

الـعـلـم لـيـس بـالـشـهـادات والـدرجـات والجامعات

وكم من عالم جليل وقدير تفوق وهو لا يقرأ ولا يكتب.

فالجرح يزيد.. ولا يحتمل المزيد

يا من أنعم الله عليهم بنعمة الوالدين...

في مجلس به أُناس فقدوا أحد والديهم أو كليهما

لاتتحدثوا عن حنان وعطايا وهبات أمهاتكم أو آبآئكم لكم

ولكن إذا كان ولابد فقولوا ( ولستم كاذبين في ذلك ) :

فقدان الوالدين قد يزيد من سرعة النضج وقوة الشخصية

وقد يكسب الشخص خبرات وقد رات عالية في تحمل المسؤوليات والمهام.

فالجرح يزيد.. ولا يحتمل المزيد

يا من أنعم الله عليه :

بالمال...

بالصحة...

بالجمال...

بالحرية...

بالنجاح...

بالسمع.. بالبصر.. بالكلام ...باللمس...

بأي نعمة ملموسة أو لا...

بأي نعمة يفتقدها غيرك...

***************

تذكر أن:

1-

الله هو ولي النعم.

2-

التضامن مع الناس شئ جميل.

3-

جرح المشاعر بقصد او بدون قصد شئ مخزي ومهين.

لا ترقص فوق جراح الآخرين

وتذكر انك حين ترقص فوق جراحهم فإنها تزيد وتزيد

وأنك بجهلك تقتلهم

لأنّ جراحهم للأسف.. لا تــحـــتـمـل المـزٍيـد

أجمل 38 جملة !!
إذا لم تعلم أين تذهب , فكل الطرق تفي بالغرض

يوجد دائماً من هو أشقى منك , فابتسم
)يظل الرجل طفلاً , حتى تموت أمه , فإذا ماتت ، شاخ فجأة (
عندما تحب عدوك , يحس بتفاهته
إذا طعنت من الخلف , فاعلم أنك في المقدمة
الكلام اللين يغلب الحق البين
كلنا كالقمر .. له جانب مظلم
لا تتحدى إنساناً ليس لديه ما يخسره
العين التي لا تبكي , لا تبصر في الواقع شيئاً
المهزوم إذا ابتسم , افقد المنتصر لذة الفوز
لا خير في يمنى بغير يسار
الجزع عند المصيبة , مصيبة أخرى
الابتسامة كلمة معروفه من غير حروف
اعمل على أن يحبك الناس عندما تغادر منصبك , كما يحبونك عندما تتسلمه لا تطعن في ذوق زوجتك , فقد اختارتك أولا
لن تستطيع أن تمنع طيور الهم أن تحلق فوق رأسك
و لكنك تستطيع أن تمنعها أن تعشش في رأسك
تصادق مع الذئاب ... على أن يكون فأسك مستعداً
ذوو النفوس الدنيئة , يجدون اللذة في التفتيش عن أخطاء العظماء
إنك تخطو نحو الشيخوخة يوماً مقابل كل دقيقة من الغضب
كن صديقاً , ولا تطمع أن يكون لك صديق
إن بعض القول فن .. فاجعل الإصغاء فناً
الذي يولد يزحف , لا يستطيع أن يطير
اللسان الطويل دلالة على اليد القصيرة
نحن نحب الماضي لأنه ذهب . ولو عاد لكرهناه
من العظماء من يشعر المرء بحضرته أنه صغير
ولكن العظيم بحق هو من يُشعر الجميع في حضرته بأنهم عظماء
من يطارد عصفورين يفقدهما
المرأة هي نصف المجتمع وهي التي تلد و تربي النصف الآخر
كلما ارتفع الإنسان , تكاثفت حوله الغيوم والمحن
لا تجادل الأحمق , فقد يخطئ الناس في التفريق بينكما
الفشل في التخطيط يقود إلى التخطيط للفشل

قد يجد الجبان 36 حلاً لمشكلته ولكن لا يعجبه سوى حل واحد
منها وهو الفرار
شق طريقك بابتسامتك خير لك من أن تشقها بسيفك
من أطاع الواشي ضيَع الصديق
أن تكون فرداً في جماعة الأسود خير لك من أن تكون قائداً للنعام
لا تستحِ من إعطاء القليل فإن الحرمان اقل منه

Islam is the first God message

The Whole Truth About Islam And Jesus (Peace Be Upon Him)

What Islam Says About Jesus (Peace Be Upon Him) ? Why So Many Religions ?? Any Difference ?? Am I in the Right Way ??

Those Are the Main Questions to Find The Main Truth in This Life ...

What’s Islam??
Islam is the first God message (begins with Abraham peace be upon him) and last one (completed by Mohammed peace be upon him) from God to all the humanity (Poor and Rich, Arabe and no Arabe, Strong or Weak, Black or White…), Islam has the same message as the all other religions from God (Jewish, Christianity), it came to correct people believes which is changed during the time by humans which they was supposed to protect it, but the holy book of Islam (Quoran) didn’t change, it’s like it’s received by Mohammed (peace be upon him) from God first time before more than 1400 years, and God promised that it will stay correct like it is and he will protect it until the end of world.

What’re religions given from God??
Like we know there are three religions given by God, from older to newer:
0. Believing on one God : religion before was just to believe on one God and so many basic social rules, because life at the beginning was very simple, later religion will be developed to go on with the humanity development.
1. Islam given from God to Abraham (peace be upon him) the father of (Jews, Christians, Muslims).
2. Jewish (Messengers of this religion are so much the most important who bring the holy book for Jews is Moussa (peace be upon him)).
3. Christianity by the Messenger Jesus or Aissa on Arabic (peace be upon him).
4. Islam given from God to Mohammed (peace be upon him) as last message and complete religion.

What are the Islam’s believes??
Muslims believe like it should be on all other religions before to change them:
- That there’s one God
- That God has no father no sun, and he create the whole world
- That Moussa and Jesus and Mohammed (peace be upon them) are just messengers from God
- Muslims believes and respect all the messengers before Islam
- That there will be the end of world and God will ask everyone about what he did during his life
- We should not make any difference between what all other messengers gave from God

Why there are three religions from God ??!!
First thing names are not interesting because all religions gave the same message (without any derivation or changing by humans) : which are God is one, God create everything, these life is a test and there’s a hell(for who doesn’t believe on God and hurt people…) and paradise(for who believe on God and, I say and he is good he is doing good for him and for his environment).
The story of human beings creation is the same on all the religions given from God, since the creation of our first father Adam (peace be upon him) and our first mother, therefore they come to the earth after they exit from paradise because they didn’t respect God orders and they listened to the Satan, on the earth they have a lot of generation of humans which them believes are changing and becoming false so every time they forgot them God, for that God sent messengers to guide them and to correct them believes, ago religion had no name messengers just come to teach people that there’s one God, and what God authorize and what’s denied, first religion came with Abraham(peace be upon him) the father of (Jews, Christians, Muslims) which is the origin Islam, and every time a new religion came to correct believes and what humans changed on them religion, Jewish and after Christianity until Islam came which is the last message and the end of miracles hood, before the end of world…

Islam and Terrorism any relationship!!??
1- On Islam it’s forbidden to kill people, Islam is religion of mercy as it’s something from the merciful God, it’s forbidden to hit and to hurt, so what to say about to kill a lot of people!!!, and in Quoran a very meaningful description was given which the idea is:
“Who killed a soul, is like he killed all the humanity, and who saved a soul, is like he saved all the humanity”
2- Not all Muslims are representing Islam there are good Muslims like there are a bad Muslims which they are Muslims just by nationality.
3- Terrorism has no religion; it’s a human comportment not God orders…
4- Terrorists have political views and they are not defending Islam like they say, but they are fighting for them personal goals, Islam is protected by God until the end of this world.
5- Terrorism is a political definition given to Islam.

Who is Jesus in Islam ??

In Quoran there’s a whole part named by the name of Jesus Mother “Marry(peace be upon them both)” which give a the whole truth about them, this is a youtube link for this part with English translation : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5aIi3OqOJU

Islam honors all the prophets who were sent to mankind. Muslims respect all prophets in general, but Jesus in particular, because he was one of the prophets who foretold the coming of Muhammad. Muslims, too, await the second coming of Jesus. They consider him one of the greatest of Allah's prophets to mankind. A Muslim does not refer to him simply as "Jesus," but normally adds the phrase "peace be upon him" as a sign of respect.

No other religion in the world respects and dignifies Jesus as Islam does. The Quran confirms his virgin birth (a chapter of the Quran is entitled "Mary"), and Mary is considered to have been one of the purest women in all creation. The Quran describes Jesus' birth as follows:
"Behold!' the Angel said, God has chosen you, and purified you, and chosen you above the women of all nations."
[Noble Quran 3:42]
"Mary, God gives you good news of a word from Him, whose name shall be the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, honored in this world and in the Hereafter, and one of those brought near to God. He shall speak to the people from his cradle and in maturity, and he shall be of the righteous. She said: "My Lord! How shall I have a son when no man has touched me?' He said: "Even so; God creates what He will. When He decrees a thing, He says to it, 'Be!' and it is."
[Noble Quran 3:45-47]

Muslims believe that Jesus was born immaculately, and through the same power which had brought Eve to life and Adam into being without a father or a mother.

"Truly, the likeness of Jesus with God is as the likeness of Adam. He created him of dust, and then said to him, 'Be!' and he was."
[Noble Quran 3:59]

During his prophetic mission, Jesus performed many miracles. The Quran tells us that he said:
"I have come to you with a sign from your Lord: I make for you out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, and breathe into it and it becomes a bird by God's leave. And I heal the blind, and the lepers, and I raise the dead by God's leave."
[Noble Quran 3:49]

Muhammad and Jesus, as well as the other prophets, were sent to confirm the belief in one God. This is referred to in the Quran where Jesus is reported as saying that he came:
"To attest the law which was before me, and to make lawful to you part of what was forbidden you; I have come to you with a sign from your Lord, so fear God and obey me."
[Noble Quran 3:50]

Prophet Muhammad emphasized the importance of Jesus by saying: "Whoever believes there is no god but Allah, alone without partner, that Muhammad is His messenger, that Jesus is a servant and messenger of God, His word breathed into Mary and a spirit emanating from Him, and that Paradise and Hell are true, shall be received by God into Heaven.

"Do they not consider the Qur'an? Had it been from any other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy."

"Do they not consider the Qur'an? Had it been from any other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy."

This is a clear challenge to the non-Muslim.Basically, it invites him to find a mistake. As a matter of fact, the seriousness and difficulty of the challenge aside, the actual presentation of such a challenge in the first place is not even in human nature and is inconsistent with man's personality. One doesn't take an exam in school after finishing the exam, write a note to the instructor at the end saying, "This exam is perfect. There are no mistakes in it. Find one if you can!". One just doesn't do that. The teacher would not sleep until he found a mistake! And yet this is the way the Qur'an approaches people. Another interesting attitude that exists in the Qur'an repeatedly deals with its advice to the reader. The Qur'an informs that reader about different facts and then gives the advice: "If you want to know more about this or that, or if you doubt what is said, then you should ask those who have knowledge." This too is a surprising attitude. It is not usual to have a book that comes from someone without training in geography, botany, biology, etc., who discusses these subjects and then advises the reader to ask men of knowledge if he doubts anything.

Yet in every age there have been Muslims who have followed the advice of the Qur'an and made surprising discoveries. If one looks to the works of Muslim scientists if many centuries ago, one will find them full of quotations from the Qur'an. These works state that they did research in such a place, looking for something. And they affirm that the reason they looked in such and such a place was that the Qur'an pointed them in that direction. For example, the Qur'an mentions man's origin and then tells the reader, "Research it!" It gives the reader a hint where to look and then states that one should find out more about it. This is the kind of thing that Muslims today largely seem to overlook - but not always, as illustrated in the following example. A few years ago, a group of men in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia collected all if the verses in the Qur'an which discuss embryology - the growth of the human being in the womb. They said, "Here is what the Qur'an says. Is it the truth?" In essence, they took the advice of the Qur'an: "Ask the men who know." They chose, as it happened, a non-Muslim who is a professor of embryology at the University of Toronto. His name is Keith Moore, and he is the author of textbooks on embryology - a world expert on the subject. They invited him to Riyadh and said, "This is what the Qur'an says about your subject. Is it true? What can you tell us?" While he was in Riyadh, they gave him all of the help that he needed in translation and all of the cooperation for which he asked. And he was so surprised at what he found that he changed his textbooks. In fact, in the second edition of one of his books, called Before we are born... in the second edition about the history of embryology, he included some material that was not in the first edition because of what he found in the Qur'an. Truly this illustrates that the Qur'an was ahead of its time and that those who believe in the Qur'an know what other people do not know.

I had the pleasure of interviewing Dr. Keith Moore for a television presentation, and we talked a great deal about this - it was illustrated by slides and so on. He mentioned that some of the things that the Qur'an states about the growth of the human being were not known until thirty years ago. In fact, he said that one item in particular - the Qur'an's description of the human being as a "leech-like clot" ('alaqah) at one stage - was new to him; but when he checked on it, he found that it was true, and so he added it to his book. He said, "I never thought of that before," and he went to the zoology department and asked for a picture of a leech. When he found that it looked just like the human embryo, he decided to include both pictures in one of his textbooks. Dr. Moore also wrote a book on clinical embryology, and when he presented this information in Toronto, it caused quite a stir throughout Canada. It was on the front pages of some of the newspapers across Canada, and some of the headlines were quite funny. For instance, one headline read: "SURPRISING THING FOUND IN ANCIENT BOOK!"! It seems obvious from this example that people do not clearly understand what it is all about. As a matter of fact, one newspaper reporter asked Professor Moore, "Don't you think That maybe the Arabs might have known about these things - the description of the embryo, its appearance and how it changes and grows? Maybe there were not scientists, but maybe they did something crude dissections on their own - carved up people and examined these things."

The professor immediately pointed out to him that he [i.e., the reporter] had missed a very important point - all of the slides of the embryo that had been shown and had been projected in the film had come from pictures taken through a microscope. He said, "It does not matter if someone had tried to discover embryology fourteen centuries ago, they could not have seen it!". All of the descriptions in the Qur'an of the appearance of the embryo are of the item when it is still too small to see with the eye; therefore, one needs a microscope to see it. Since such a device had only been around for little more than two hundred years, Dr. Moore taunted, "Maybe fourteen centuries ago someone secretly had a microscope and did this research, making no mistakes anywhere. Then he somehow taught Muhammad and convinced him to put this information in his book. Then he destroyed his equipment and kept it a secret forever. Do you believe that? You really should not unless you bring some proof because it is such a ridiculous theory." In fact, when he was asked "How do you explain this information in the Qur'an?" Dr. Moore's reply was, "It could only have been divinely revealed."!

Although the aforementioned example of man researching information contained in the Qur'an deals with a non-Muslim, it is still valid because he is one of those who is knowledgeable in the subject being researched. Had some layman claimed that what the Qur'an says about embryology is true, then one would not necessarily have to accept his word. However, because of the high position, respect, and esteem man gives scholars, one naturally assumes that if they research a subject and arrive at a conclusion based on that research, then the conclusion is valid. One of Professor Moore's colleagues, Marshall Johnson, deals extensively with geology at the University of Toronto.

He became very interested in the fact that the Qur'an's statements about embryology are accurate, and so he asked Muslims to collect everything contained in the Qur'an which deals with his specialty. Again people were very surprised at the findings. Since there are a vast number subjects discussed in the Qur'an, it would certainly require a large amount of time to exhaust each subject. It suffices for the purpose of this discussion to state that the Qur'an makes very clear and concise statements about various subjects while simultaneously advising the reader to verify the authenticity of these statements with research by scholars in those subjects. And as illustrated by the Qur'an has clearly emerged authentic. Undoubtedly, there is an attitude in the Qur'an which is not found anywhere else. It is interesting how when the Qur'an provides information, it often tells the reader, "You did not know this before." Indeed, there is no scripture that exists which makes that claim. All of the other ancient writings and scriptures that people have, do give a lot of information, but they always state where the information came from.

For example, when the Bible discusses ancient history, it states that this king lived here, this one fought in a certain battle, another one had so may sons, etc. Yet it always stipulates that if you want more information, then you should read the book of so and so because that is where the information came from. In contrast to this concept, the Qur'an provides the reader with information and states that this information is something new. Of course, there always exists the advice to research the information provided and verify its authenticity. It is interesting that such a concept was never challenged by non-Muslims fourteen centuries ago. Indeed, the Makkans who hated the Muslims, and time and time again they heard such revelations claiming to bring new information; yet, they never spoke up and said, "This is not new. We know where Muhammad got this information. We learned this at school."

They could never challenge its authenticity because it really was new! In concurrence with the advice given in the Qur'an to research information (even if it is new), when 'Umar was caliph, he chose a group of men and sent them to find the wall of Dhul-Qarnayn. Before the Qur'anic revelation, the Arabs had never heard of such a wall, but because the Qur'an described it, they were able to discover it. As a matter of fact, it is now located in what is called Durbend in the Soviet Union. It must be stressed here that the Qur'an is accurate about many, many things, but accuracy does not necessarily mean that a book is a divine revelation. In fact, accuracy is only one of the criteria for divine revelations.

For instance, the telephone book is accurate, but that does not mean that it is divinely revealed. The real problem lies in that one must establish some proof of the source the Qur'an's information. The emphasis is on the reader. One cannot simply deny the Qur'an's authenticity without sufficient proof. If, indeed, one finds a mistake, then he has the right to disqualify it. This is exactly what the Qur'an encourages. Once a man came up to me after a lecture I delivered in South Africa. He was very angry about what I had said, and so he claimed, "I am going to go home tonight and find a mistake in the Qur'an." Of course, I said, "Congratulations. That is the most intelligent thing that you have said." Certainly, this is the approach Muslims need to take with those who doubt the Qur'an's authenticity, because the Qur'an itself offers the same challenge. An inevitably, after accepting it's challenge and discovering that it is true, these people will come to believe it because they could not disqualify it. In essence, the Qur'an earns their respect because they themselves have had to verify its authenticity. An essential fact that cannot be reiterated enough concerning the authenticity of the Qur'an is that one's inability to explain a phenomenon himself does not require his acceptance of the phenomenon's existence or another person's explanation of it.

Specifically, just because one cannot explain something does not mean that one has to accept someone else's explanation. However, the person's refusal of other explanations reverts the burden of proof back on himself to find a feasible answer. This general theory applies to numerous concepts in life, but fits most wonderfully with the Qur'anic challenge, for it creates a difficulty for one who says, "I do not believe it." At the onset of refusal one immediately has an obligation to find an explanation himself if he feels others' answers are inadequate. In fact, in one particular Qur'anic verse which I have always seen mistranslated into English, Allah mentions a man who heard the truth explained to him. It states that he was derelict in his duty because after he heard the information, he left without checking the verity of what he had heard. In other words, one is guilty if he hears something and does not research it and check to see whether it is true. One is supposed to process all information and decide what is garbage to be thrown out and what is worthwhile information to be kept and benefited from at a later date. One cannot just let it rattle around in his head. It must be put in the proper categories and approached from that point of view. For example, if the information is still speculatory, then one must discern whether it's closer to being true or false. But if all of the facts have been presented, then one must decide absolutely between these two options. And even if one is not positive about the authenticity of the information, he is still required to process all of the information and make the admission that he just does not know for sure. Although this last point appears to be futile, in actuality, it is beneficial to the arrival at a positive conclusion at a later time in that it forces the person to at least recognize, research and review the facts. This familiarity with the information will give the person "the edge" when future discoveries are made and additional information is presented. The important thing is that one deals with the facts and does not simply discard them out of empathy and disinterest.

The real certainty about the truthfulness of the Qur'an is evident in the confidence which is prevalent throughout it; and this confidence comes from a different approach - "Exhausting the Alternatives." In essence, the Qur'an states, "This book is a divine revelation; if you do not believe that, then what is it?" In other words, the reader is challenged to come up with some other explanation. Here is a book made of paper and ink. Where did it come from? It says it is a divine revelation; if it is not, then what is its source? The interesting fact is that no one has with an explanation that works. In fact, all alternatives have bee exhausted. As has been well established by non-Muslims, these alternatives basically are reduces to two mutually exclusive schools of thought, insisting on one or the other. On one hand, there exists a large group of people who have researched the Qur'an for hundreds of years and who claim, "One thing we know for sure - that man, Muhammad, thought he was a prophet. He was crazy!" They are convinced that Muhammad (SAW) was fooled somehow. Then on the other hand, there is another group which alleges, "Because of this evidence, one thing we know for sure is that that man, Muhammad, was a liar!" Ironically, these two groups never seem to get together without contradicting. In fact, many references on Islam usually claim both theories. They start out by saying that Muhammad (SAW) was crazy and then end by saying that he was a liar. They never seem to realize that he could not have been both!

For example, if one is deluded and really thinks that he is a prophet, then he does not sit up late at night planning, "How will I fool the people tomorrow so that they think I am a prophet?" He truly believes that he is a prophet, and he trusts that the answer will be given to him by revelation. As a matter of fact, a great deal of the Qur'an came in answer to questions. Someone would ask Muhammad (SAW) a question, and the revelation would come with the answer to it. Certainly, if one is crazy and believes that an angel put words in his ear, then when someone asks him a question, he thinks that the angel will give him the answer. Because he is crazy, he really thinks that. He does not tell someone to wait a short while and then run to his friends and ask them, "Does anyone know the answer?" This type of behavior is characteristic of one who does not believe that he is a prophet. What the non-Muslims refuse to accept is that you cannot have it both ways. One can be deluded, or he can be a liar. He can be either one or neither, but he certainly cannot be both! The emphasis is on the fact that they are unquestionably mutually exclusive personal traits.

The following scenario is a good example of the kind of circle that non-Muslims go around in constantly. If you ask one of them, "What is the origin of the Qur'an?" He tells you that it originated from the mind of a man who was crazy. Then you ask him, "If it came from his head, then where did he get the information contained in it? Certainly the Qur'an mentions many things with which the Arabs were not familiar." So in order to explain the fact which you bring him, he changes his position and says, "Well, maybe he was not crazy. Maybe some foreigner brought him the information. So he lied and told people that he was a prophet." At this point then you have to ask him, "If Muhammad was a liar, then where did he get his confidence? Why did he behave as though he really thought he was a prophet?" Finally backed into a corner, like a cat he quickly lashes out with the first response that comes to his mind. Forgetting that he has already exhausted that possibility, he claims, "Well, maybe he wasn't a liar. He was probably crazy and really thought that he was a prophet." And thus he begins the futile circle again.

As has already been mentioned, there is much information contained in the Qur'an whose source cannot be attributed to anyone other than Allah. For example, who told Muhammad about the wall of Dhul-Qarnayn - a place hundreds of miles to the north? Who told him about embryology? When people assemble facts such as these, if they are not willing to attribute their existence to a divine source, they automatically resort to the assumption someone brought Muhammad the information and that he used it to fool the people. However, this theory can easily be disproved with one simple question: "If Muhammad was a liar, where did he get his confidence? Why did he tell some people out right to their face what others could never say?" Such confidence depends completely upon being convinced that one has a true divine revelation. For example, the Prophet (SAW) had an uncle by the name of Abu Lahab. This man hated Islam to such an extent that he used to follow the Prophet around in order to discredit him. If Abu Lahab saw the Prophet (SAW) speaking to a stranger, he would wait until they parted and then would go to the stranger and ask him, "What did he tell you? Did he say, 'Black.'? Well, it's white. Did he say, 'Morning.'? Well, it's night." He faithfully said the exact opposite of whatever he heard Muhammad (SAW) and the Muslims say. However, about ten years before Abu Lahab died, a little chapter in the Qur'an was revealed to him. It distinctly stated that he would go to the Fire (i.e., Hell). In other words, it affirmed that he would never become a Muslim and would therefore be condemned forever. For ten years all Abu Lahab had to do was say, "I heard that it has been revealed to Muhammad that I will never change - that I will never become a Muslim and will enter the Hellfire. Well I want to become a Muslim now. How do you like that? What do you think of your divine revelation now?" But he never did that. And yet, that is exactly the kind of behavior one would have expected from him since he always sought to contradict Islam. In essence, Muhammad (SAW) said, "You hate me and you want to finish me? Here, say these words, and I am finished. Come on, say them!" But Abu Lahab never said them. Ten years! And in all that time he never accepted Islam or even became sympathetic to the Islamic cause. How could Muhammad possibly have known for sure that Abu Lahab would fulfill the Qur'anic revelation if he (i.e., Muhammad) was not truly the messenger of Allah? How could he possibly have been so confident as to give someone 10 years to discredit his claim of Prophethood? The only answer is that he was Allah's messenger; for in order to put forth suck a risky challenge, one has to be entirely convinced that he has a divine revelation.

Another example of the confidence which Muhammad (SAW) had in his own Prophethood and consequently in the divine protection of himself and his message is when he left Makkah and hid in a cave with Abu Bakr during their emigration to Madeenah. The two clearly saw people coming to kill them, and Abu Bakr was afraid. Certainly, if Muhammad (SAW) was a liar, a forger and one who was trying to fool the people into believing that he was a prophet, one would have expected him to say in such a circumstance to his friend, "Hey, Abu Bakr, see if you can find a back way out of this cave." Or "Squat down in that corner over there and keep quiet." Yet, in fact, what he said to Abu Bakr clearly illustrated his confidence. He told him, "Relax! Allah is with us, and Allah will save us!"

Now, if one knows that he is fooling the people, where does one get this kind of attitude? In fact, such a frame of mind is not characteristic of a liar or a forger at all. So, as has been previously mentioned, the non-Muslims go around and around in a circle, searching for a way out - some way to explain the findings in the Qur'an without attributing them to their proper source. On one hand, they tell you on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, "The man was a liar," and on the other hand, on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday they tell you, "He was crazy." What they refuse to accept is that one cannot have it both ways; yet they refuse to accept is that one cannot have it both ways; yet they need both excuses to explain the information in the Qur'an.

About seven years ago, I had a minister over to my home. In the particular room which we were sitting there was a Qur'an on the table, face down, and so the minister was not aware of which book it was. In the midst of a discussion, I pointed to the Qur'an and said, "I have confidence in that book." Looking at the Qur'an but not knowing which book it was , he replied, "Well, I tell you, if that book is not the Bible, it was written by a man!" In response to his statement, I said, "Let me tell you something about what is in that book." And in just three to four minutes I related to him a few things contained in the Qur'an. After just those three or four minutes, he completely changed his position and declared, "You are right. A man did not write that book. The Devil wrote it!" Indeed, possessing such an attitude is very unfortunate - for many reasons. For one thing, it is a very quick and cheap excuse. It is an instant exit out of an uncomfortable situation. As a matter of fact, there is a famous story in the Bible that mentions how one day some of the Jews were witnesses when Jesus raised a man from the dead. The man had been dead for four days, and when Jesus arrived, he simply said, "Get up!" and the man arose and walked away. At such a sight, some of the Jews who were watching said disbelievingly, "This is the Devil. The Devil helped him!" Now this story is rehearsed often in churches all over the world, and people cry big tears over it, saying, "Oh, if I had been there, I would not have been as stupid as the Jews!" Yet ironically, these people do exactly what the Jews did when in just three minutes you show them only a small part of the Qur'an and all they can say is, "Oh, the Devil did it. The devil wrote that book!". Because they are truly backed into a corner and have no other viable answer, they resort to the quickest and cheapest excuse available. Another Example of people's use of this weak stance can be found in the Makkans' explanation of the source of Muhammed's message. They used to say, "The devils bring Muhammad that Qur'an!" But just as with every other suggestion made, the Qur'an gives the answer. One verse in particular states:

"And they say, 'Surely he is possessed [by jinn], 'but it [i.e., the Qur'an] is not except a reminder to the worlds."

Thus it gives an argument in reply to such a theory. In fact, there are many arguments in the Qur'an in reply to the suggestion that devils brought Muhammad (SAW) his message. For example, in the 26th chapter Allah clearly affirms:

"No evil ones have brought it [i.e., this revelation] down. It would neither be fitting for them, nor would they be able. Indeed they have been removed far from hearing."

And in another place in the Qur'an, Allah instructs us:

"So when you recite the Qur'an seek refuge in Allah from Shaytaan, the rejected."

Now is this how Satan writes a book? He tells one, "Before you read my book, ask God to save you from me."? This is very, very tricky. Indeed, a man could write something like this, but would Satan do this? Many people clearly illustrate that they cannot come to one conclusion on this subject. On one hand, they claim that Satan would not do such a thing and that even if he could, God would not allow him to; yet, on the other hand, they also believe that Satan is only that much less than God. In essence they allege that the Devil can probably do whatever God can do. And as a result, when they look at the Qur'an, even as surprised as they are as to how amazing it is, they still insist, "The Devil did this!" Thanks be to Allah, Muslims do not have that attitude. Although Satan may have some abilities, they are a long way separated from the abilities of Allah. And no Muslim is a Muslim unless he believes that. It is common knowledge even among non-Muslims that the Devil can easily make mistakes, and it would be expected that he would contradict himself if and when he wrote a book. For indeed, the Qur'an states:

"Do they not consider the Qur'an? Had it been from any other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy."

In conjunction with the excuses that non-Muslims advance in futile attempts to justify unexplainable verses in the Qur'an, there is another attack often rendered which seems to be a combination of the theories that Muhammad (SAW) was crazy and a liar. Basically, these people propose that Muhammad was insane, and as a result of his delusion, he lied to and misled people. There is a name for this in psychology. It is referred to as mythomania. It means simply that one tells lies and then believes them. This is what the non-Muslims say Muhammad (SAW) suffered from. But the only problem with this proposal is that one suffering from mythomania absolutely cannot deal with facts, and yet the whole Qur'an is based entirely upon facts. Everything contained in it can be researched and established as true. Since facts are such a problem for a mythomaniac, when a psychologist tries to treat one suffering from that condition, he continually confronts him with facts. For example, if one is mentally ill and claims, "I am the king of England," a psychologist does not say to him "No you aren't. You are crazy!" He just does not do that. Rather, he confronts him with facts and says, "O.K., you say you are the king of England. So tell me where the queen is today. And where is your prime minister? And where are your guards?" Now, when the man has trouble trying to deal with these questions, he tries to make excuses, saying Uh... the queen... she has gone to her mother's. Uh... the prime minister... well he died." And eventually he is cured because he cannot deal with the facts. If the psychologist continues confronting him with enough facts, finally he faces the reality and says, "I guess I am not the king of England." The Qur'an approaches everyone who reads it in very much the same way a psychologist treats his mythomania patient. There is a verse in the Qur'an which states:

"Oh mankind, there has come to you an admonition [i.e., the Qur'an] from your Lord and a healing for what is in the hearts - and guidance and mercy for the believers."

At first glance, this statement appears vague, but the meaning of this verse is clear when one views it in light of the aforementioned example. Basically, one is healed of his delusions by reading the Qur'an. In essence, it is therapy. It literally cures deluded people by confronting them with facts. A prevalent attitude throughout the Qur'an is one which says, "Oh mankind, you say such and such about this; but what about such and such? How can you say this when you know that?" And so forth. It forces one to consider what is relevant and what matters while simultaneously healing one of the delusions that the facts presented to mankind by Allah can easily be explained away with flimsy theories and excuses. It is this very sort of thing - confronting people with facts - that had captured the attention of many non-Muslims. In fact, there exists a very interesting reference concerning this subject in the New Catholic Encyclopedia.

In an article under the subject of the Qur'an, the Catholic Church states, "Over the centuries, many theories have been offered as to the origin of the Qur'an... Today no sensible man accepts any of these theories."!! Now here is the age-old Catholic Church, which has been around for so many centuries, denying these futile attempts to explain away the Qur'an. Indeed, the Qur'an is a problem for the Catholic Church. It states that it is revelation, so they study it. Certainly, they would love to find proof that it is not, but they cannot. They cannot find a viable explanation. But at least they are honest in their research and do not accept the first unsubstantiated interpretation which comes along. The Church states that in fourteen centuries it has not yet been presented a sensible explanation. At least it admits that the Qur'an is not an easy subject to dismiss. Certainly, other people are much less honest. They quickly say, "Oh, the Qur'an came from here. The Qur'an came from there." And they do not even examine the credibility of what they are stating most of the time. Of course, such a statement by the Catholic Church leaves the everyday Christian in some difficulty. It just may be that he has his own ideas as to the origin of the Qur'an, but as a single member of the Church, he cannot really act upon his own theory. Such an action would be contrary to the obedience, allegiance and loyalty which the Church demands. By virtue of his membership, he must accept what the Catholic Church declares without question and establish its teachings as part of his everyday routine. So, in essence, if the Catholic Church as a whole is saying, "Do not listen to these unconfirmed reports about the Qur'an," then what can be said about the Islamic point of view? Even non-Muslims are admitting that there is something to the Qur'an - something that has to be acknowledged - then why are people so stubborn and defensive and hostile when Muslims advance the very same theory? This is certainly something for those with mind a to contemplate - something to ponder for those of understanding!

Recently, the leading intellectual in the Catholic Church - a man by the name of Hans - studied the Qur'an and gave his opinion of what he had read. This man has been around for some time, and he is highly respected in the Catholic Church, and after careful scrutiny, he reported his findings, concluding, "God has spoken to man through the man, Muhammad." Again this is a conclusion arrived at by a non-Muslim source - the very leading intellectual of the Catholic Church himself! I do not think that the Pope agrees with him, but nonetheless, the opinion of such a noted, repute public figure must carry some weight in defense of the Muslim position. He must be applauded for facing the reality that the Qur'an is not something which can be easily pushed aside and that, in fact God is the source of these words. As is evident from the aforementioned information, all of the possibilities have been exhausted, so the chance of finding another possibility of dismissing the Qur'an is nonexistent. For if the book is not a revelation, then it is a deception; and if it is a deception, one must ask, "What is its origin" And where does it deceive us?" Indeed, the true answers to these questions shed light on the Qur'an's authenticity and silence the bitter unsubstantiated claims of the unbelievers. Certainly, if people are going to insist that the Qur'an is a deception, then they must bring forth evidence to support such a claim. The burden of proof is on them, not us! One is never supposed to advance a theory without sufficient corroborating facts; so I say to them, "Show me one deception! Show me where the Qur'an deceives me! Show me, otherwise, don't say that it is a deception!" An interesting characteristic of the Qur'an is how it deals with surprising phenomena which relate not only to the past but to modern times as well. In essence, the Qur'an is not and old problem. It is still a problem even today - a problem to the non-Muslims that is. For everyday, every week, every year brings more and more evidence that the Qur'an is a force to be contended with - that its authenticity is no longer to be challenged! For example, one verse in the Qur'an reads;

"Do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined together, then We clove them asunder, and made from water every living thing? Will they not then believe?"

Ironically, this very information is exactly what they awarded the 1973 Noble Prize for - to a couple of unbelievers. The Qur'an reveals the origin of the universe - how it began from one piece - and mankind continues to verify this revelation, even up to now. Additionally, the fact that all life originated from water would not have been an easy thing to convince people of fourteen centuries ago. Indeed, if 1400 years ago you had stood in the desert and told someone, "All of this, you see (pointing to yourself), is made up of mostly water," no one would have believed you. Proof of that was not available until the invention of the microscope. They had to wait to find out that cytoplasm, the basic substance of the cell, is made-up of 80% water. Nonetheless, the evidence did come, and once again the Qur'an stood the test of time. In reference to the falsification tests mentioned earlier, it is interesting to note that they, too, relate to both the past and the present. Some of them were used as illustrations of Allah's omnipotence and knowledge, while others continue to stand as challenges to the present day. An example of the former is the statement made in the Qur'an about Abu Lahab. It clearly illustrates that Allah, the Knower of the Unseen, knew that Abu Lahab would never change his ways and accept Islam. Thus Allah dictated that he would be condemned to the Hellfire forever. Such a chapter was both an illustration of Allah's divine wisdom and a warning to those who were like Abu Lahab.

An interesting example of the latter type of falsification tests contained in the Qur'an is the verse which mentions the relationship between the Muslims and the Jews. The verse is careful not to narrow its scope to the relationship between individual members of each religion, but rather, it summarizes the relationship between the two groups of people as a whole. In essence, the Qur'an states that the Christians will always treat the Muslims better than the Jews will treat the Muslims. Indeed, the full impact of such a statement can only be felt after careful consideration of the real meaning of such a verse. It is true that many Christians and many Jews have become Muslims, but as a whole, the Jewish community is to be viewed as an avid enemy of Islam. Additionally, very few people realize what such an open declaration in the Qur'an invites. In essence, it is an easy chance for the Jews to prove that the Qur'an is false - that it is not a divine revelation. All they have to do is organize themselves, treat the Muslims nicely for a few years and then say, "Now what does your holy book say about who are your best friends in the world - the Jews or the Christians? Look what we Jews have done for you!" That is all they have to do to disprove the Qur'an's authenticity, yet they have not done it in 1400 years. But, as always, the offer still stands open!

All of the examples so far given concerning the I various angles from which one can approach the | Qur'an have undoubtedly been subjective in nature; I however there does exist another angle, among others, which is objective and whose basis is mathematical. It is surprising how authentic the Qur'an becomes when one assembles what might be referred to as a list of good guesses. Mathematically, it can be explained using guessing and prediction examples. For instance, if a person has two choices (i.e., one is right, and one is wrong), and he closes his eyes and makes a choice, then half of the time (i.e., one time out of two) he will be right. Basically, he has a one in two chance, for he could pick the wrong choice, or he could pick the right choice. Now if the same person has two situations like that (i.e., he could be right or wrong about situation number one, and he could be right or wrong about situation number two), and he closes his eyes and guesses, then he will only be right one fourth of the time (i.e., one time out of four). He now has a one in four chance because now there are three ways for him to be wrong and only one way for him to be right. In simple terms, he could make the wrong choice in situation number one and then make the wrong choice in situation number two; OR he could make the wrong choice in situation number one and then make the right choice in situation number two; OR he could make the right choice in situation number one and then make the wrong choice in situation number two; OR he could make the right choice in situation number one and then make the right choice in situation number two. Of course, the(only instance in which he could be totally right is the last scenario where he could guess correctly in both situations. The odds of his guessing completely correctly have become greater because the number of situations for him to guess in have increased; and the mathematical equation representing such a scenario is 1/2 x 1/2 (i.e., one time out of two for the first situation multiplied by one time out of two for the second situation).

Continuing on with the example, if the same person now has three situations in which to make blind guesses, then he will only be right one eighth of the time (i.e., one time out of eight or 1/2 X 1/2 X 1/2). Again, the odds of choosing the correct choice in all three situations have decreased his chances of being completely correct to only one time in eight. It must be understood that as the number of situations increase, the chances of being right decrease, for the two phenomena are inversely proportional.

Now applying this example to the situations in the Qur'an, if one draws up a list of all of the subjects about which the Qur'an has made correct statements, it becomes very clear that it is highly unlikely that they were all just correct blind guesses. Indeed, the subjects discussed in the Qur'an are numerous, and thus the odds of someone just making lucky guesses about all of them become practically nil. If there are a million ways for the Qur'an to be wrong, yet each time it is right, then it is unlikely that someone was guessing. The following three examples of subjects about which the Qur'an has made correct statements collectively illustrate how the Qur'an continues to beat the odds.

In the 16th chapter the Qur'an mentions that the female bee leaves its home to gather food.l2 Now, a person might guess on that, saying, "The bee that you see flying around - it could be male, or it could be female. I think I will guess female." Certainly, he has a one in two chance of being right. So it happens that the Qur'an is right. But it also happens that was not what most people believed at the time when the Qur'an was revealed. Can you tell the difference between a male and a female bee? Well, it takes a specialist to do that, but it has been discovered that the male bee never leaves his home to gather food. However, in Shakespeare's play, Henry the Fourth, some of the characters discuss bees and mention that the bees are soldiers and have a king. That is what people thought in Shakespeare's time - that the bees that one sees flying around are male bees and that they go home and answer to a king. However, that is not true at all. The fact is that they are females, and they answer to a queen. Yet it took modern scientific investigations in the last 300 years to discover that this is the case.

So, back to the list of good guesses, concerning the topic of bees, the Qur'an had a 50/50 chance of being right, and the odds were one in two.

In addition to the subject of bees, the Qur'an also discusses the sun and the manner in which it travels through space. Again, a person can guess on that subject. When the sun moves through space, there are two options: it can travel just as a stone would travel if one threw it, or it can move of its own accord. The Qur'an states the latter - that it moves as a result of its own motion.'3 To do such, the Qur'an uses a form of the word sabaha to describe the sun's movement through space. In order to properly provide the reader with a comprehensive understanding of the implications of this Arabic verb, the following example is given. If a man is in water and the verb sabaha is applied in reference to his movement, it can be understood that he is swimming, moving of his own accord and not as a result of a direct force applied to him. Thus when this verb is used in reference to the sun's movement through space, it in no way implies that the sun is flying uncontrollably through space as a result of being hurled or the like. It simply means that the sun is turning and rotating as it travels. Now, this is what the Qur'an affirms, but was it an easy thing to discover? Can any common man tell that the sun is turning? Only in modern times was the equipment made available to project the image of the sun onto a tabletop so that one could look at it without being blinded. And through this process it was discovered that not only are there three spots on the sun but that these spots move once every 25 days. This movement is referred to as the rotation of the sun around its axis and conclusively proves that, as the Qur'an stated 1400 years ago, the sun does, indeed turn as it travels through space.

And returning once again to the subject of good guess, the odds of guessing correctly about both subjects - the sex of bees and the movement of the sun - are one in four!

Seeing as back fourteen centuries ago people probably did not understand much about time zones, the Quran's statements about this subject are considerably surprising. The concept that one family is having breakfast as the sun comes up while another family is enjoying the brisk night air is truly something to be marveled at, even in modern time. Indeed, fourteen centuries ago, a man could not travel more than thirty miles in one day, and thus it took him literally months to travel from India to Morocco, for example. And probably , when he was having supper in Morocco, he thought to himself, "Back home in India they are having supper right now." This is because he did not realize that, in the process of traveling, he moved across a time zone. Yet, because it is the words of Allah, the All-Knowing, the Qur'an recognizes and acknowledges such a phenomenon. In an interesting verse it states that when history comes to an end and the Day of Judgment arrives, it will all occurring an instant; and this very instant will catch some people in the daytime and some people at night. This clearly illustrates Allah's divine wisdom and His previous knowledge of the existence of time zones, even though such a discovery was non-existent back fourteen centuries ago. Certainly, this phenomenon is not something which is obvious to one's eyes or a result of one's experience, and this fact, in itself, suffices as proof of the Qur'ans authenticity.

Returning one final time to the subject of good guesses for the purpose of the present example, the odds that someone guessed correctly about all three of the aforementioned subjects - the sex of bees, the movement of the sun and the existence of time zones - are one in eight!

Certainly, one could continue on and on with this example, drawing up longer and longer list of good guesses; and of course, the odds would become higher and higher with each increase of subjects about which one could guess. But what no one can deny is the following; the odds that Mohammed an illiterate, guessed correctly about thousands and thousands of subjects, never once making a mistake, are so high that any theory of his authorship of the Qur'an must be completely dismissed - even by the most hostile enemies of Islam!

Indeed, the Qur'an expects this kind of challenge. Undoubtedly, if one said to someone upon entering a foreign land, "I know your father. I have met him," probably the man from that land would doubt the newcomer's word, saying, "You have just come here. How could you know my father?" As a result, he would question him, "Tell me, is my father tall, short, dark, fair? What is he like?" Of course, if the visitor continued answering all of the questions correctly, the skeptic would have no choice but to say, "I guess you do know my father. I don't know how you know him, but I guess you do!" The situation is the same with the Qur'an. It states that it originates from the One who created everything. So everyone has the right to say, "Convince me! If the author of this book really originated life and everything in the heavens and on the earth, then He should know about this, about that, and so on." And inevitably, after researching the Qur'an, everyone will discover the same truths. Additionally, we all know something for sure: we do not all have to be experts to verify what the Qur'an affirms. One's iman (faith) grows as one continues to check and confirm the truths contained in the Qur'an. And one is supposed to do so all of his life.

الثلاثاء، 11 يناير 2011

حوارات نفسية

حضرتك شو بتشتغل

كاتب؟
aly.matrix: لا
aly.matrix: ولاكنها هواية
aly.matrix: احبها
aly.matrix: هل عجبتك ما اكتب
aly.matrix: عجبك
كتابتك حلوة لكن في بعض الاحيان بعيدة عن الواقع
aly.matrix: مثل ماذا
انا في الحقيقة قرأت لك فقط مقطع صغير عن السعادة
aly.matrix: اخى الواقع نسبى بين الناس
لكن هل تعتقد بأن الانسان الذي يبحث عن الحب هو الوحيد الذي يجد السعادة
aly.matrix: لا
و أي نوع من انواع الحب تقصد
فأنواع الحب كثيرة
ربع ساعة وبرجع
مشان نكفي حديثنا
aly.matrix: السعادة ليس الحب وحدة هناك اسباب كثيرة تصنع السعادة
بعتذر عن المقاطعة
aly.matrix: وهيى داخل الانسان
aly.matrix: الحب انواع منها حب نفسك وكيف تجعلها سعيدة
aly.matrix: كيب تجملها
aly.matrix: كيف تجعلها تخدم حياتك
aly.matrix: كيف تعدل سلوكك اليومى والشهرى
aly.matrix: حب الناس من السعادة حب الحبيباكسير السعادة
aly.matrix: حب رسولك وحب قيمك وحب الله
aly.matrix: وصلت
كلامك رائع و جميل و لكن عندما يكون الحب في الله و عندما تحب من حولك تجد الكون جميلا و لكن
ارجو ان تكتب هذا الكلام للقراء مخافة ان يفهموا الحب هو حب الحبيب فقط
و جزاك الله كل خير
aly.matrix: الكون كلة يجعلك سعيد حتى ولو ما تحب كون الكون منتظم وجميل وخارق ومن صنع الله كفيل لو تفكرت انة مصدر من مصادر السعادة لو عندك استعداد نفسى لجزب حلوة الكون وروعتة
aly.matrix: لجذب
aly.matrix: صح
aecamana: مظبوط
aly.matrix:
aly.matrix: الشمس هل تسعدى؟
لو لم تخرج
aecamana: طبعا لا
aly.matrix: هكذا الكون مصدر سعادة الانسان لو حب
aly.matrix: تعلم من الكون ان تحب الناس وتحب نفسك وتحب من احبك
aly.matrix: وتحب الله
aecamana: انا احب كل من حولي
aly.matrix: هذا الحب مصدر السعادة
aecamana: و اساعد كل الناس الذين اعرفهم و لا اعرفهم
aly.matrix: تمام
aly.matrix: هل خرجت انا من الواقع
aecamana: و هذا الحب هو الحب الحقيقي
aly.matrix: نعم
aly.matrix: لو كنت ماشى انت ومن تحب وانت اخر سعادة وحدث برق ومطر هل تبقى سعيد
aecamana: في البداية فهمت الحب بأنه حب الحبيب و هذا الحب غير واقعي و ا}من به و خاصة اني مسلمة و أخاف الله
aecamana: لا اؤمن
aly.matrix: كونك مسلم اما شى اخر السعادة منبع ايمانى قيمى للواحد القهار
aecamana: و بهذا اكون انشر فكرة خاطئة
aecamana: صحيح كلامك
aly.matrix: هل انشر هذا الشات
aecamana: ايه
aly.matrix: توافق على نشر هذا الكلام
aecamana: اوافق
aly.matrix: نكمل
aly.matrix: واساللك
aecamana: تفضل
aly.matrix: الخوف من اى شى هل يوثر الخوف فى سلوكك
aly.matrix: اى
aecamana: طبعا يجعل الانسان مرتبك و لا يستطيع فعل أي شيء
aly.matrix: ما الزمن الذى تستغرقة فى حالة الحزن
aecamana: حسب تأثرك بالشيء الذي سبب لك الحزن يدوم الحزن
aly.matrix: الوحدة صتاعة داخلية او خارجية عندك؟
aecamana: هي داخلية لأنك عندما تكون حزينا تحب الوحدة
aly.matrix: الضحك من اى سبب وهل يجعلك سعيد ما الزمن الى تكتسبة من وقت الضحك
aecamana: دقيقتين و راجعة
aly.matrix: اكول وقت للحزن كام يوما؟
aly.matrix: اطول
aly.matrix: اسف
aly.matrix: http://me.zorpia.com/Ahmed2151?rcpt=sweet3@gawab.com#c64302594
aly.matrix: http://me.zorpia.com/Ahmed2151?rcpt=sweet3@gawab.com#c64302594
aly.matrix: http://alswasy300.blogspot.com/
aly.matrix: دة كلة صراع
السعادة مش صراع
مع ما وهبك الله من اسباب السعادة
لا صراع
انما لحظات جميلة قلما نجدها امامنا
وادا وجدناها نعيشها بحب ولهمة وحنية
هذة الحظات هل تاتى من فراغ ام من محاولة منك ان تكونى سعيدة
حسب الوقت
سابقا أتجنب الشعور بالحزن بأن أعلم أن ما أصابك لم يكن يخطأك وما أخطئك لم يكن ليصيبك وان الله قد كتب ذلك وأن الله إسترد ما أعطاك إياه وهو سيعطيك المزيد وما هو خير لله ما أخذ وما أعطى وكل شيء عنده لأجل مسمى.

aly.matrix:
· أتجنب الشعور بالمستحيل بأن أفكر بالمستحيلات التي حققتها وحققها الآخرون وأن أفكر في ما أعمله اليوم ليقربني مما أظنه مستحيلا . التوازن ومن والاحباط والسقوط هل لديكى اصرار على الاستمرار والعودة مرة اخرى؟
صرا ع نفسي
واقتصادي
العودة لايه
الى انكى تكونى سعيدة
ام تستمرى فى السقوط فى بئر الاحزان
اعيشها في كل لحظة كاني اسرقها من الزمن
ومن اللحظة التي اعيشها
جميل
ما هية نوع السعادة التى اتمناها من حبيبى؟
ولا اترك الاحزان تهزمني
صح
aly.matrix: انت تحب دي لحظة سعادة
تشتاق له دي اخرى
تغير عليه دي اروع لحظاته
تخاصمه بردو لحظة سعادة وحب
انفاسه لمساته لهفتو على الاخر
اشتياقو لرؤيته
دي كلها اسباب من لحظات الحب
· أتجنب الشعور بالخوف بأن أعلم أن ماأصابك لم يكن ليخطئك وإن ما اخطاك لم يكن ليصيبك وأنني ساواجه أي شيء .
aly.matrix: http://sweet-300.maktoobblog.com/recent-posts
aly.matrix: i`m idm l],khjn
aly.matrix: هذة هى مدوناتى
aecamana: الضحك لا يجعلك دائما سعيدا ولأنه احيانا تضحك مجاملة للشخص الذي يضحكك

اطول وقت للحزن هو عندما تفقد الام طفلها
aly.matrix: هذا ليس ضحك انما صراع نفسى بين المجاملة وعدم حب الاخر
aecamana: نع لدي اصرار للاستمرار
aecamana: و العودة من جديد
aly.matrix: ممكن اعرف انتى رجل ام انسة
aly.matrix: والسن
aecamana: و انا احب فقط الله سبحانه و تعالى و احب عائلتي و الناس الذين احبهم في الله
aly.matrix: برحتك
aly.matrix: ضرورى على شان اعرف من اناقش
aly.matrix: هل تحبين ان تكونى مجهولة او مجهول
aecamana: مجهولة
aly.matrix: هههههههههههههههههه
aecamana:
aly.matrix: تمام كدى عرفت
aly.matrix: يا ست مجهولة تشرفنا بكم
aly.matrix: نكمل على هذا الاساس

aecamana: و انا تشرفت بمعرفتك
aly.matrix: عادى عندى لا اعرف اسمك
aly.matrix: انتى خايفة من حاجة
aly.matrix: انتى ما عندك ثقة فى نفسك
aly.matrix: او حريصة
aly.matrix: ومن الحرص ما قتل
aecamana: انا لا اثق بشخص لا لا اعرفه
aly.matrix: تمام
aly.matrix: عندك حق
aly.matrix: واحترم ريك
aecamana: شكرا
aly.matrix: من الاشياء الزوقية ان عندما نتكلم مع اى شخص واجب ان تعرفة ما اسمك حتى تستقيم الامور
aly.matrix: الا اذا كان اسمك ممنوع من الصرف
aly.matrix: كل هذة الاسباب تمنعك
aecamana: اسمي كتير حلو بس انا راح اعطيك اسم مستعار
aly.matrix: ما تفرق
aecamana: اماني
aly.matrix: محسوبة عليك كذبة
aly.matrix: والمومن لا يكذب
aecamana:
aly.matrix: لا تفعلى خليكى مجهولة

aly.matrix: احسن

aly.matrix: اسمك مجهولة هانم
aecamana: انا ما كذبت
aly.matrix: الاسم المستعار كذب
aecamana: لأني خبرتك انه اسم مستعار
aly.matrix: ما تفرق
aecamana: لا بتفرق كتير
aly.matrix: ثقى انى مومن بالله ولى قيمى التى لا اميل عنها
aecamana: لأني انا صريحة
aly.matrix: انتهينا الى حل وسط اسمك مجهولة
aly.matrix: اسمك
aecamana: دروس الحياة علمتني ان لا اثق باحد لا اعرفه
aly.matrix:
· أتجنب الشعور باليأس بالنهوض من جديد والدعاء وتغيير الطريقة والقراءة والتحفيز الذات .
تمام
aly.matrix: صح
aecamana: اوكي
aly.matrix: وانا لا اطلب اسمك
aly.matrix: نكمل