The reader positive

The reader positive is read for the benefit and increase knowledge and awareness of conscious, but at the same time not be dealing with the ideas of writer with the claims of the author or the content of pages of the book Like the Dead in the hands of laundry, or كالريشة in the wind, but be in the same moments reading lectured witted and ready to discuss ideas of the author and contained the folds of the books of the theses, he's ready to say what no one knows (perhaps Satben matter and Sadersh) and Ready fully ready to say what he sees error (This in my view, otherwise the right thing but maybe the writer evidence that does not teach her) (I'll be) and when he sees a good idea, beautiful and compelling, it is recorded and is keen to ensure the conformity of what convinced him with the facts timeless (as it may have been some convictions need to straighten out) and when he sees that the writer presents the idea (violation of what he sees), but supported by evidence (scientific not emotional)
Vhannk reader negative negative implemented: This does not have the willingness to say to the writer and the book (probably) do not (Satthbt) nor (I will study the matter) nor (Does this make sense) or not ......... it is not entirely convinced all what he read from the ideas of
He is docile to theses others, especially when available are two two
First: the lack of science has, it does not enjoy the culture and not heavy reading Monetary give it the ability to ask questions Altthbtah to read
II: Beyond the full content of what he reads ..... For example, when there is weak in forensic science ...... and sees to the question of what (legitimate) is convinced by the gallery because he originally did not know what speaks author and do not conflict with the evidence clerk he does not see only one face of the idea
This type of readers often يتقلبون in views and awesome change their ideas quickly because they do not spring from a firm base nor solid ground

Type II: reader passive negative light: This kind of readers have a culture of good in multiple areas allows them to understand what it means to the writer and understand the content of the idea that he wants by delivering them to them, but their problem is they do not have the courage to criticize or because they do not have the mechanisms criticism nor his ways Fshaaaram either be

1 - I even saved
2 - Maybe the writer wants something and I did not understand (Hist good for me)
3 - Author Know what he says to me (he discussed and studied) is sure

This theoretical side

But when you consider the practical side Here lies the problem